The Malcolm Berko Blog

After frustrating decades of failed social experiments, many Americans have finally realized that being Politically Correct is a foofy illusion fostered by a delusional minority, and an effete left wing media, all of whom believe it’s possible to pick up a turd by its clean end. “Do not discriminate! Diversity is our friend! All men are created equal!” These and other politically correct, placable bromides are the mantric incantations of the Church, the Academes, the Nouveau Riche and Silly Flat-Earth Idiots (CANS) who rely on social causes to nourish their mental health. So they figuratively become messianic, soap-box agitators who believe in the goodness of man, that love conquers all, the Easter Bunny and the Great Pumpkin. And if you refuse to accept their bromidic theses, they will, with alacrity, brand you a bigot, a racist and heaven forbid an atheist! Well, what the hell, considering the number of people who have been killed and tortured in God’s name, many clear thinking Americans are eager to become born again atheists. However, it seems that these well meaning tub-thumpers conveniently ignore numerous examples from the most well read history book of all time – The Holy Bible. Frankly there’s not much holy about a book that is the most bloody chronicle in all the literature of the world..  The story of Abel, Cain and their daddy, Adam is the first example of discrimination. Consider the citizens of Sodom or Gomorrah whose behaviors god considered unacceptable…including all those cute, happy, blue-eyed babies and fair-skinned, pubescent children. Of course there’s the tale of the “Big Flood” wherein god took the life of every human except Noah and his family. Hells bells even Allah, Moses and each of the 265 Popes are guilty of overt discrimination, however those daft and dotty CANS will go to great lengths to explain that they possessed a divine right to do so. Still, the historical lessons here are (1) Man has always discriminated, (2) Diversity is not tolerated and (3) All men are not created equal. Many CANS consider this heresy and these who do, according to most psychologists, have problems with premature ejaculation. Some CANS know these historical lessons are true and refuse to acknowledge it. They’re hopeless romantic; and romantics spend a fortune on Viagra or Cialis. Other CANS tacitly admit the truth but fervently believe the truth can be overcome. They are balmy fools and neither Viagra nor Cialis will help them. Still other CANS publicly acclaim the truth but believe that man’s goodness will prevail. These people are neurotic, dangerous and spend lots of money on ladies of the night. And finally, some CANS admit the truth and work very quietly behind the scenes to deny it. They are psychotic, insidious and never get laid. These blithering idiots would rather that all of us be equal under slavery then unequal in a society of freedom. However most of us recognize that inequality is as dear to the American Heart as Liberty itself.

“Don’t Discriminate!” Poppycock! Discrimination is a natural human response and as much a part of our autonomic nervous system as a blink and a yawn. We practice discrimination in our preference of neighborhoods, clothing, art, language, hair style, music, job skills, etc. This is called (OD) or Object Discrimination. OD is an acceptable behavior and people practice it everyday. Though we may be roundly criticized for our choices, OD is not considered a negative behavior. But suppose that John discriminates against Lekisha because her accent is offensive. The modifying verb “against” colors the active verb “discriminate” as an unacceptable and negative behavior. Interesting? (1) WOULD you (a) Prefer to have a loveable, funny Christian friend or (b) A dull, Muslim friend without a sense of humor? (2) WOULD you choose a roommate who is (a) A law abiding, well read and from a middle class family or (b) A roommate who has unsavory friends, is on food stamps and lives in the ghetto? (3) If your business needed a receptionist WOULD you (a) Hire a lady who looks like Elizabeth Hurley, speaks with a delightful English accent and dresses conservatively or (b) Hire a Hispanic female who is 75 pounds over weight, speaks ghetto English and has visible piercings and body tattoos? Get my drift? Now, if you selected only members of the “b” group, do you think that members of the “a” group would feel discriminated against? However, if you selected only members of the “a” group it’s almost a certainty that “b” group members would scream discrimination. They would tell us that we are biased because of “b’s” differences in language, dress and appearance. Well darn, most of us (even the CANS) don’t want to “walk that walk,” “talk that talk” or “dress that dress.” So it’s logical to conclude that “a” is being discriminated against by “b” because “b,” who will not accept “a’s” differences but insists that “a” accept “b’s”differences. Major differences between people and their ethnic heritage is one of the reasons that antagonism will always exist; because differences imply superiority and superiority leads to predominance.  

People discriminate because they identify characteristics in others they perceive as negative and recognize that those characteristics give life to a discomfiting and non-productive environment. Well Jesus Christ on a Chris Craft, any normal, healthy, Native Born American (NBA) would feel threatened by other NBA’s whose characteristics are antagonistic to their milieu. If the characteristics of a specific NBA group are perceived as egregious then other NBA’s would naturally do their darndest to avoid the appearance of “guilt by association.” This is Social Discrimination (SD). It’s a flight response to avoid a potential threat and it is a natural behavior to avoid assimilation into a regressive culture. It’s self-preservation so unless you’re a wuss you are expected to discriminate because you have a duty to forebear that danger.

One of the most evident examples of this behavior derives from NBA blacks, an ethnic group that (according to Bell Curve, anecdotal evidence and empirical observation) figuratively stands lower on the intellectual and achievement scale than most whites. This reproach will be construed as racists by the CANS, and as an excuse for NBAs to discriminate against blacks. But that assumption is as wrong as Corrigan and two left shoes. The NBA black isn’t discriminated against because of his color; rather he’s discriminated against because of what his skin color is likely to tell us about him. Many observers believe that it is possible to make correct assumptions about some people if we know their heritage. For example: Asians have higher IQ’s than Caucasians, Jews are good business people, blacks are superb athletes, Germans are excellent scientists, Italians are great lovers, etc. etc. and etc. And its common knowledge that a significantly large number of NBA blacks have very evident characteristics that distinguish them from the NBA mainstream culture. Casual observation inarguably concludes that black crime rates, black homicide rates, educational level, language, dress code and social structures are behaviors clearly unacceptable to the majority of NBAs. The NBA black’s combative and provoking efforts to force their culture on the NBA mainstream is intolerably offensive and mocks the culture of most NBAs whose values form the tribunal of approval. Therefore they must discriminate to protect their values. However few things are more difficult for minority groups to accept than an annoying truth.

So let’s drop this palaver that “all men are created equal,” that “we must not discriminate” and that “diversity is your friend.” Those palliative bromides are promoted by all well meaning CANS who believe that equality is a right, but fail to realize that no power on Earth can turn it into fact. If you “follow the money,” you will note that pro-diversity is a Big Business promoted by whites, blacks and CANS who suck in billions of dollars a year selling consulting services, grant approvals, office space, legal and accounting services, computer equipment, organizational skills, printing and office supplies, etc. Anti-Discrimination is a multi-billion dollar business and a deeply entrenched interest (imagine how much Messrs Jackson, Sharpton, Reverend Wright and others make) stands to loose big money and important influence if discrimination ceased to exist. And these folks are tremendously successful because they tie most Native Born Americans into such politically correct knots that every governmental agency is afraid of being sued for discrimination by some smart-aleck, candy-assed, civil rights lawyer.